A superscript epsilon c indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval. This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense. Government 1. It is the classification is required. In these two cases, a dtraf symbol one or more specific operations.
When the laboratory test results education or experience and should not be used in conjunction indtcate that the soil is close to another soil classification group, the with professional judgment. Not all aspects of this practice may borderline condition can be indicated with two symbols separated by a be applicable in all circumstances.
This ASTM standard is not slash. The first symbol should be the one based on this standard. Borderline symbols are particularly the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, useful when the liquid limit vahre of clayey soils is close to Referenced Documents passing the 3-in.
See Appendix X2. Testing Size3 NOTE 3—When quantitative information is required for detailed de- D Guide to Site Characterization for Engineering, De- signs of important structures, this test method must be supplemented by sign and Construction Purposes laboratory tests or other quantitative data to determine performance D Practice for Dry Preparation of Soil Samples for characteristics under expected field conditions.
Pubfished May Originnfly published as D — 66 T. Last previous edition D — Vol D Practice for Minimum Requirements for Agencies 3. D Classification of Peat Samples by Laboratory Test- dark-brown to black color, a spongy consistency, and a texture ing4 ranging from fibrous to amorphous.
Terminology Coarse—passes No. Medium—passes No. Fine—passes No. Cobbles—particles of rock that will pass a in. For classification, a silt is a 3. Summary Fine—passes M-in. The flow charts, Fig. D when working with frozen soils. Significance and Use NOTE5—Notwithstauding the statements on precision and bias con- tained in this staudad The precision of this test method is dependent on 5.
Agencies that meet the criteria of Practice laboratory tests to determine the particle-size characteristics, D are generally considered capable of competent and objective testing. Users of this test method are cautioned that compliance with the liquid limit, and the plasticity index. Practice D does not in itself assure reliable testing. Reliable testing 5.
Apparatus 5. This standard provides a useful first step in prescribed laboratory tests, a plasticity chart, similar to Fig. It is a good appropriate remark. Classification of Peat 7. Sampling 8.
Where only the 8. See 9. Whenever possible, the field samples should have weights 9. Appendix X3 describes the wet preparation method cumulative particle-size distribution curve, as described in and is the preferred method for cohesive soils that have never 9.
ZOor more fines, a hydrometer analysis of the material, a hydrometer analysis is determination of the percent fines, percent sand, and percent not necessary for soil classification.
For soils estimated to contain 90 YOfines or more, the mm material must be determined and reported as auxiliary percent fines, percent sand, and percent gravel may be esti- information. Preliminary Classification Procedure 9. A determined in See area identified as CL on Fig. See area identified as CH on Fig. NOTE 8—In cases where the liquid limit exceeds or the plasticity index exceeds 60, the plasticity chart may be expanded by maintaining the Classify the soil as an organic silt, OL, if the.
The primary objective of soil classification is to divide the soil into various categories such that all the soil in a particular category has similar characteristics and nature. The soil is classified into different groups so that one group exhibits a similar type of behaviour in a particular engineering situation.
Soil classification also functions as a common basis for the exchange of knowledge and experience regarding soil. In such classification, soil in each group is generally denoted by a particular group symbol and a general description. The general description mostly includes the characteristic colour of the soil as well as the details regarding the chief particle of which the soil is composed. The soil classification must be based on the engineering properties of soil that are most pertinent for the purpose for which the classification has been made.
The MIT system of soil classification was first developed by Prof. The triangular chart consists of different groups of soil indicating different percentages of sand, silt and clay-sized particles.
In this classification, first of all, the soil sample is sieved to determine the percentage of sand, silt and clay-sized particles. The textural classification of soils is highly suitable for the classification of coarse-grained soils. The unified soil classification was first introduced by Casagrande and was adopted for the first time by the Corps of Engineers of the United States of America in A unified classification of soils is the most commonly adopted classification system of soil for engineering purpose.
In this classification system, the soil is classified based on both the plasticity characteristics and the particle size of the soil. Each group is identified using a group symbol. The group symbol consists of primary and secondary descriptive letters. The major divisions, however, include three categories namely coarse-grained soils, fine-grained soils and organic soils. The major divisions of the soil according to this classification have been briefly described as follows:.
Fine-grained soil is further categorized into Low plastic L and High plastic H. This subdivision of the fine-grained is done based on the plasticity characteristics of the soil.
0コメント